The meeting started by awarding
high-achievers in the school district. First the elementary students, then seniors
in Goshen High, then adults part of a successful committee. They went through
some of the happenings currently in the district to keep the board informed.
One interesting proposal was about iPad and Android apps for each of the
schools. It was highly praised, as was mostly everything presented at the beginning,
including test scores and IB courses. Interestingly, the school sports very
high test scores on AP and IB exams despite having around 65% of students on
free-reduced lunch.
Another
cool program was the Music Together program, which uses singing and dancing to
establish connections between parents and their young toddlers. This program is
apparently a really big deal and Goshen is the center for research and
development of this program in the country (I learned this elsewhere). That
pretty much ended the reporting section, where people presented their data and
the board applauded them and asked for any questions. Next was the Action-item
section.
During the
action section, the board would read over an idea, possibly do a quick overview
of it, then the president would call a vote using the audible word “I” as a
vote for yes. All the votes were unanimous, and it seemed there was not much
time allotted for anyone who might disagree.
I think it
is worth mentioning that I heard many of the vocabulary words from the sheet
while listening to the talks. Specifically, I heard the terms, summative test,
magnet school, and charter school, and I know there were a few more that I forgot
to record. It was interesting how applicable those terms were already.
This
meeting was pretty much what I expected. I viewed the democratic system much
the same as a do now, but I did expect much more arguing and negativity. There
was a surprisingly low negativity content in the room, very few critical
comments, and no arguing—much more civil than expected.
School boards
seem to be a group of top individuals in the school system who are in charge of
various sectors of the schools who can all put their minds and opinions
together to make decisions about the schools. They use democracy to find what
the majority of the members want to make the calls on financial, school
content, technological, and allocation-based decisions. Rather than having one
person do it or a large body like congress, which takes a very long time to
pass anything, a small elite group is used to make decisions. They have the
power through that system to approve or deny proposed actions to happen in the
school system. They can provide funding for certain departments and take it away.
This felt a
lot more connected to the classroom than I think most board meetings would be.
They had students involved for a good portion of the meeting, and they covered
topics that related directly to the classroom such as the AP and IB exams. Some
of the content, more financial stuff like the increasing of the cost for
free-reduced lunch, seemed to be distant from the classroom because they didn’t
address how that would affect the individual students. However, for the most
part, the meeting seemed to keep daily school life in perspective.
Though as I
said earlier, there were no heated debates, I still learned a lot about the
workings of the school board and its functions.
No comments:
Post a Comment